Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-16 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 is slightly better than the Motorola Moto E7 Plus, getting an 81.7 score against 75.7. The Galaxy S8 is an much older cellphone than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, but Samsung could make it thinner and incredibly lighter anyway. Galaxy S8 has a much sharper screen than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much better pixels quantity per display inch and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2960.
Galaxy S8 counts with a little faster processor than Motorola Moto E7 Plus. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cores. Motorola Moto E7 Plus counts with slightly more memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Motorola Moto E7 Plus also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Moto E7 Plus counts with a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S8, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Moto E7 Plus shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S8, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Moto E7 Plus also has better 60 fps video frame rates, a way more MP camera in the back and a lot bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.