Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-16 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is slightly better than the Motorola Moto E7 Plus, getting a score of 81.9 against 75.7. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active's design is a lot older, just a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier than the Motorola Moto E7 Plus. The Galaxy S8 Active counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1440 x 2960 resolution and much more pixels per inch of screen.
The Moto E7 Plus has slightly more memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto E7 Plus also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active features a bit superior processing unit than Moto E7 Plus. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
Motorola Moto E7 Plus takes better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and a same size camera aperture, the Motorola Moto E7 Plus also has a camera with a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution, better video frame rate and a lot bigger camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Motorola Moto E7 Plus counts with improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.