Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-16 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 is better than the Moto E7 Plus, getting an 83.3 score against 75.7. The Samsung Galaxy S9 is an older phone than Moto E7 Plus, but Samsung managed to make it a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. Galaxy S9 features a much better display than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and way more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy S9 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto E7 Plus. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Moto E7 Plus has a bit bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S9, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Moto E7 Plus also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Moto E7 Plus features a superior battery duration than Galaxy S9, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Moto E7 Plus takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Moto E7 Plus also counts with a much bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality and a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.