Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-09-16 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 270 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than Moto E7 Plus's 75.7 score. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while Moto E7 Plus has Android 10 version, giving some extra features. Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a incredibly heavier and incredibly thicker cellphone than Moto E7 Plus.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a lot better display than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a much greater display pixel density. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's storage capacity for games and applications is very similar to the Moto E7 Plus one, they have a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB and exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto E7 Plus. They have 8 processing cores and 4 GB of RAM memory. Moto E7 Plus has a way better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Moto E7 Plus also counts with a back camera with lot more mega pixels and a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Motorola Moto E7 Plus features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.