Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-16 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than Moto E7 Plus, having a overall score of 81 against 75.7. Even though the Galaxy XCover Pro is better than Moto E7 Plus, we must highlight that it's also a a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier cellphone. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version and Moto E7 Plus has Android 10 version.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a sharper screen than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher count of pixels per inch in the screen and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340. The Galaxy XCover Pro's storage for applications and games is just as good as the Moto E7 Plus one, both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little faster CPU than Moto E7 Plus. They have 4 GB of RAM and 8 cores. Moto E7 Plus has superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23 percent larger battery capacity. The Motorola Moto E7 Plus takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same aperture, the Motorola Moto E7 Plus also has better 60 frames per second video frame rates, a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a much bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.