Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-16 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is way better than Moto E7 Plus's 75.7 general score. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Moto E7 Plus were released only 0 months apart, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is extremely thinner but much heavier. These phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the newer 11 version and Moto E7 Plus has Android 10, providing you a couple nice extra features and performance optimizations.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a brighter display than Moto E7 Plus, because it has a better pixel density, a bigger display and a way higher 1768 x 2208 resolution. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a better performing CPU than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Moto E7 Plus has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Moto E7 Plus has a bit better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller camera sensor taking worse quality videos and photos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Moto E7 Plus also counts with a much more mega-pixels back camera and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.