Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-16 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a score of 79, which is a little bit better than Moto E7 Plus's 75.7 general score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S body is just a little heavier but just a bit thinner than Moto E7 Plus, and they were released only 5 months apart. These phones work with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a more recent 11 version while Moto E7 Plus has Android 10 version.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a much better display than Moto E7 Plus, because it has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400, more pixels per inch of screen and a quite bigger display. Moto E7 Plus and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S count with really similar memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and exactly the same internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a little bit better hardware performance than Moto E7 Plus. They have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a battery performance that's just as good as the battery life in Motorola Moto E7 Plus, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a 0% more battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a bit better camera than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures and video in low light environments, and they both have a 0.5 inches sensor and a back camera with a 48 MP resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.