Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-07-28 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.48 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 306 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.83 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2470mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.4 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is way better than Moto G (2015)'s overall score of 65.2. The LG V35 ThinQ is a notably newer and way thinner cellphone than the Moto G (2015), but it's a bit heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit sharper display than Moto G (2015), because it has a much higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution, a larger screen and a lot higher screen density.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G (2015), because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G (2015), because it has a larger number of cores (and also faster) and a larger amount of RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a very superior battery lifetime than Moto G (2015), because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity. LG V35 ThinQ features a much better camera than Motorola Moto G (2015), because it has a higher 16 mega pixels resolution camera, a larger aperture to capture better low light photos and a way higher (4K) video quality.
The LG V35 ThinQ costs a little more money than Motorola Moto G (2015), but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.