Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 65.2 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2015-07-28 | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.48 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 306 GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 7.83 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2470mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 4.4 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has a general score of 80.7, which is a lot better than Motorola Moto G (2015)'s 65.2 score. Galaxy Note 3 is an older and just a little bit heavier phone than the Motorola Moto G (2015), but Samsung was able to make it way thinner anyway. Both devices in this review include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 3 has the previous 5.0 version and Motorola Moto G (2015) has Android 5.1.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a superior performance than Motorola Moto G (2015), because it has a higher amount of RAM, more cores and an additional graphics processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a little sharper display than Motorola Moto G (2015), because it has more pixels per inch of screen, a lot higher resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a little bit bigger display.
The Galaxy Note 3 shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G (2015), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have a 13 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G (2015), because it has 48 GB more internal memory and an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 64 GB. Galaxy Note 3 features improved battery lifetime than Moto G (2015), because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 3 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bit cheaper, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.