Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2020-07-08 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is a bit better than Moto G 5G Plus, getting a global score of 88.1 against 82.6. The iPhone X is an noticeably older phone than the Moto G 5G Plus, but Apple was able to build it somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. IPhone X counts with a little faster processing unit than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has lesser CPU cores and 1 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
IPhone X features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels density and a quite better 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus captures better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone X, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also counts with a lot larger sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality, a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos and a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a bit more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Moto G 5G Plus features a very superior battery performance than iPhone X, because it has an 84 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.