Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2020-07-08 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, getting a global score of 84.2 against 82.6. IPhone XS's design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, although it was released around 22 months before. Apple iPhone XS has a superior processor than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone XS also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The Apple iPhone XS counts with a bit better display than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a little bit better number of pixels per inch of display. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a much better camera than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing lot higher quality pictures, a back facing camera with a lot better resolution and a bigger aperture to capture better photos and video in low-light situations.
Moto G 5G Plus counts with a superior storage for apps and games than iPhone XS, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Moto G 5G Plus also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with a very superior battery life than Apple iPhone XS, because it has an 88 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.