Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2020-07-08 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Black, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G Plus is a little bit better than Google Pixel, having a general score of 82.6 against 80.2. Even though the Moto G 5G Plus is extremely newer than Google Pixel, it's much heavier and just a bit thicker. The Moto G 5G Plus features just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a higher number of cores.
Google Pixel counts with a bit sharper display than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a really smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a quite greater pixels density. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has a larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality, a much more MP back-facing camera and a larger aperture.
Moto G 5G Plus counts with much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Moto G 5G Plus features a much better battery life than Google Pixel, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.