Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2020-07-08 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3, getting a overall score of 82.6 against 80. Although Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is newer than the Google Pixel 3, it is somewhat thicker and heavier. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a slightly better display than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2160px resolution, it also counts with a quite higher screen pixels density.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus. They have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM amount. Moto G 5G Plus features a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Moto G 5G Plus also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a much better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has a much better 48 MP resolution camera, a much bigger sensor which provides a way better image and video quality and a larger camera aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited environments.
Moto G 5G Plus features a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 72% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.