Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2020-07-08 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G Plus has a general score of 82.6, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 3 XL's 80.7 overall score. Even though the Moto G 5G Plus is newer than the Google Pixel 3 XL, it's somewhat thicker and heavier. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a little bit better display than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a better pixels density.
Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus. Both of them have 8 processing cores and a 4 GB RAM. Moto G 5G Plus has a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Moto G 5G Plus features a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 46 percent bigger battery size. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus takes better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has a bigger camera aperture for better low light photography, a back camera with a way better resolution and a much larger sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.