Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2020-07-08 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G Plus is a little bit better than Google Pixel 4, getting an 82.6 score against 81.9. Even though Moto G 5G Plus is a better cellphone than Google Pixel 4, we must highlight that it is also a bit thicker and notably heavier. The Google Pixel 4 has just a bit better looking display than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a little smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel amount per display inch.
Google Pixel 4 has a little faster CPU than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Moto G 5G Plus shoots much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same aperture and the same video quality, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a lot larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a back camera with way more megapixels.
Moto G 5G Plus has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Moto G 5G Plus also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Moto G 5G Plus features a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.