Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2020-07-08 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is just a bit better than Moto G 5G Plus, having a overall score of 82.9 against 82.6. The Google Pixel 4 XL is a just a little thinner and just a little bit lighter cellphone than Moto G 5G Plus, even though both of them were released only a couple of months apart. The Google Pixel 4 XL features a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit sharper display than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3040 and a higher display density. Moto G 5G Plus features a much better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same video frame rate and a F1.7 aperture, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a way bigger back camera sensor shooting way better quality photographs and a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB. The Moto G 5G Plus has improved battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 35% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.