Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-07-08 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 409 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G Plus has a general score of 82.6, which is a little bit better than HTC One M9's 77.7 global score. Even though the Moto G 5G Plus is notably heavier than the HTC One M9, it's a little thinner and much newer. The HTC One M9 counts with a little faster processing unit than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 8 processing cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit CPU and a graphics processor.
HTC One M9 features a more vivid display than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a really smaller screen and a little bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a little higher amount of pixels per inch of display. Moto G 5G Plus has a much better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a much bigger camera aperture to take better low light photography and video, a back facing camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution and a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Moto G 5G Plus features a very superior memory to store more games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has 64 GB internal memory and an external SD slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Moto G 5G Plus has a superior battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.