Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-07-08 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is slightly better than LG G7 ThinQ, getting an 82.6 score against 81. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus's construction is much newer than the LG G7 ThinQ's, but it is extremely heavier and somewhat thicker. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with a more vivid screen than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120px resolution and a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display. The Moto G 5G Plus has a better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for taking photos and video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Moto G 5G Plus also counts with a camera with a way higher resolution and a way bigger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and pictures.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a better storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG G7 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Moto G 5G Plus has a much better battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.