Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-08 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8 ThinQ has a score of 84.3, which is a little bit better than Moto G 5G Plus's 82.6 global score. Although LG G8 ThinQ is older than Moto G 5G Plus, it's construction is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner. The LG G8 ThinQ features just a bit better processing power than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG G8 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
The LG G8 ThinQ counts with a much better display than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a greater pixel density. The Moto G 5G Plus counts with a much better camera than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Moto G 5G Plus also counts with a lot better resolution camera in the back and a much bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photos.
The LG G8 ThinQ has a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G 5G Plus, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory. The Moto G 5G Plus features a much better battery performance than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.