Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-08 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ is a little bit better than the Moto G 5G Plus, having a overall score of 82.7 against 82.6. LG G8X ThinQ's body is a little bit thinner and a bit lighter than the Moto G 5G Plus, even when they were released only a couple of months apart. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processor than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG G8X ThinQ also has more RAM.
LG G8X ThinQ features a bit better looking display than Moto G 5G Plus, although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, a little smaller display and a little lower pixel quantity in each display inch. LG G8X ThinQ has a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G 5G Plus, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also counts with a lot more mega pixels back facing camera, a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Moto G 5G Plus has longer battery life than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.