Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-07-08 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Surfing blue | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has an overall score of 82.6, which is a little bit better than the LG V30S ThinQ's 82.5 overall score. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus's design is way newer, but notably heavier and somewhat thicker than the LG V30S ThinQ. The LG V30S ThinQ features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen density and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM. Moto G 5G Plus takes much better videos and photos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Moto G 5G Plus also counts with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a lot bigger sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal storage. Moto G 5G Plus counts with a superior battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.