Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2020-07-08 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G Plus has a general score of 82.6, which is slightly better than the LG V35 ThinQ's overall score of 81.3. Moto G 5G Plus's body is notably newer, but thicker and much heavier than the LG V35 ThinQ. The LG V35 ThinQ has just a little better performance than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ features a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel number per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution. Moto G 5G Plus takes much better videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video definition, the Moto G 5G Plus also counts with a lot better 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality pictures and videos.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a greater memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG V35 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto G 5G Plus counts with a way better battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.