Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-08 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is a little bit better than the Moto G 5G Plus, getting a general score of 87.6 against 82.6. LG V60 ThinQ is a a little heavier phone than the Moto G 5G Plus, but both of them have the same thickness. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Moto G 5G Plus and LG V60 ThinQ have extremely similar screens, because although the LG V60 ThinQ has a bit inferior number of pixels per inch in the screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2460px, it also counts with a quite bigger display. The LG V60 ThinQ features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a lot worse (4K) video definition, a back facing camera with a much lower 48 mega pixels resolution and a smaller back camera sensor, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture. LG V60 ThinQ has a battery performance that is very similar to the battery performance in Moto G 5G Plus.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.