Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2020-07-08 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than Moto G 5G Plus's 82.6 overall score. The LG Velvet construction is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than Moto G 5G Plus, even though both were only released 2 months apart. LG Velvet and Motorola Moto G 5G Plus feature incredibly similar displays, because although the LG Velvet has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a bit worse count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit bigger display.
LG Velvet counts with just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Velvet also has a larger amount of RAM memory. LG Velvet has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Moto G 5G Plus, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal storage.
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has greater battery life than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a bit better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same sensor size, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same video frame rates and a back camera with a 48 mega pixels, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has a larger aperture for better low-light captures and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.