Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Microsoft |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-08 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has an overall score of 85.3, which is a little bit better than Moto G 5G Plus's 82.6 global score. Even though the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a lot heavier than Moto G 5G Plus, it's way thinner and also newer. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a little more vivid screen than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a just a little worse pixel number in each screen inch, it also counts with a better resolution of 1892 x 2688px and a bigger display.
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a bit superior CPU than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Moto G 5G Plus counts with just a bit longer battery life than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has a 12 percent bigger battery capacity. The Moto G 5G Plus captures much clearer pictures and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have a same size aperture and the same video resolution, the Moto G 5G Plus also counts with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.