Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-08 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Cyber shade |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3S, having an 82.6 score against 75.8. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus's body is a bit thinner and just a bit lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S, even when both of them were released only 9 months apart. The nubia Red Magic 3S and Moto G 5G Plus both count with incredibly similar displays, and although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a little worse 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little lower pixels density, they both have a display with the same size.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a slightly better memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus and the nubia Red Magic 3S feature similar batteries duration. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, a 0.5 inches camera sensor and a back facing camera with a 48 mega-pixels, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a way better 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.