Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-07-08 | -- |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G Plus is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, with a overall score of 82.6 against 76.2. Although it's the best device in our current comparison, the Moto G 5G Plus design is somewhat thicker and just a little bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. The Galaxy A16 5G features a bit better display than Moto G 5G Plus, although it has a just a little worse display pixels density and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, they both have a same size display.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with a lot better performance than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. Both have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processor. The Galaxy A16 5G features a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB, the Galaxy A16 5G also has more internal memory capacity.
Moto G 5G Plus counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a camera in the back with a lower resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better captures in low light situations. Galaxy A16 5G's battery lifetime is very similar to Motorola Moto G 5G Plus's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.