Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-08 | 2020-06-29 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Black |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a global score of 82.6, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A21's general score of 76.1. Despite being the best in our current comparison, Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is a just a little heavier and just a bit thicker phone than Samsung Galaxy A21. Samsung Galaxy A21 and Motorola Moto G 5G Plus both count with incredibly similar processors, and although the Samsung Galaxy A21 has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Moto G 5G Plus has a brighter screen than Galaxy A21, because it has a lot better pixels density, a quite larger screen and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2520. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A21, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light environments, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a much larger camera sensor capturing lot better quality photos and a much more MP camera.
Moto G 5G Plus counts with a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A21, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 32 GB more internal storage capacity. The Moto G 5G Plus features greater battery duration than Galaxy A21, because it has a 25% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.