Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-07-08 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, getting a score of 82.6 against 79.9. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is a much older, a little bit thicker and a little heavier device than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G. The Moto G 5G Plus counts with a much powerful CPU than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a bit better display than Moto G 5G Plus, although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen and a bit smaller display. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has just a bit better camera than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a back facing camera with lesser MP and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photos and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G 5G Plus, because it has more internal memory and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A25 5G's battery duration is very similar to the battery lifetime in Motorola Moto G 5G Plus.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.