Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2020-07-08 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G Plus is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), having an 82.6 score against 75.8. Moto G 5G Plus's design is notably newer than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)'s, although it is extremely heavier and somewhat thicker. Moto G 5G Plus counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy A5 (2017) has a display that is just as good as the display in Moto G 5G Plus, because although the Galaxy A5 (2017) has a much smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel density. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus captures way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a way better video definition, a camera in the back with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution and a bigger aperture for better images and video in low light environments.
The Moto G 5G Plus counts with a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a SD card slot that supports up to 1000 GB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a really longer battery performance than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.