Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-08 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is a bit better than the Moto G 5G Plus, with an 86.6 score against 82.6. Galaxy A50s is a thinner and somewhat lighter cellphone than the Moto G 5G Plus, even when they were released with only 9 months difference. Galaxy A50s counts with a screen that's just as good as Moto G 5G Plus's display, although the Galaxy A50s has a little smaller screen, a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit worse screen density.
The Galaxy A50s has a slightly bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports 488 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A50s features a little faster processor than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Moto G 5G Plus has improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. Galaxy A50s's camera is very similar to the Moto G 5G Plus one, and although the Galaxy A50s has a tinier diafragm aperture, they both have a 0.5 inches back camera sensor, a same resolution camera, the same video frame rate and the same video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.