Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-08 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a score of 85.5, which is slightly better than Moto G 5G Plus's global score of 82.6. Samsung Galaxy A51 is a somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter phone than Moto G 5G Plus, even though they were released only a couple months apart. Samsung Galaxy A51's processor is just as good as the CPU in Moto G 5G Plus, both have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Galaxy A51 features a screen that is just as good as Moto G 5G Plus's screen, although the Galaxy A51 has a little bit smaller screen, a quite lower pixel density and a little bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy A51 counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds 488 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Moto G 5G Plus features superior battery performance than Galaxy A51, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. Samsung Galaxy A51's camera is just as good as Motorola Moto G 5G Plus's camera, and although the Samsung Galaxy A51 has a smaller diafragm aperture, they both have the same sensor size, the same video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.