Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-08 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Prism cube black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G is a bit better than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, with a global score of 90.8 against 82.6. Even when Galaxy A51 5G and the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus were released with only 2 months difference, Galaxy A51 5G is a little thinner and a little lighter. The Moto G 5G Plus and the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G feature very similar displays, although the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a little bit worse quantity of pixels per inch of screen, a bit smaller screen and a little worse 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Galaxy A51 5G has a better storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a SD card slot that admits up to 1000 GB, the Galaxy A51 5G also has 64 GB more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G and Moto G 5G Plus count with quite similar CPUs, and although the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a larger amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's camera is very similar to Moto G 5G Plus's camera, and although the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a smaller aperture, they both have the same resolution back camera, the same camera sensor size, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate.
The Moto G 5G Plus counts with a little longer battery life than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has an 11 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.