Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2020-07-08 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Surfing blue | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, getting a overall score of 90.7 against 82.6. The Galaxy A52 construction is a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, even when they were only released with a couple months difference. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a processor that is very similar to Moto G 5G Plus's processing unit, and although the Samsung Galaxy A52 has 2 GB more RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus and the Galaxy A52 both feature quite similar displays, although the Galaxy A52 has a quite lower pixels density, a little bit worse 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bit smaller display. The Galaxy A52 counts with just a bit better camera than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for taking photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a much better resolution camera in the back and a bigger sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a quite bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because it has an external memory slot that allows up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Moto G 5G Plus has a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy A52, because it has an 11 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.