Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-08 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s has a general score of 91.1, which is much better than the Moto G 5G Plus's 82.6 overall score. The Galaxy A52s design is newer, a little lighter and just a bit thinner than the Moto G 5G Plus. Galaxy A52s and Motorola Moto G 5G Plus both have incredibly similar screens, although the Galaxy A52s has a quite smaller display, a little bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a little bit better performance than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A52s captures just a bit better photos and videos than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking images and video in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a larger sensor and a back facing camera with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A52s features more memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G 5G Plus, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A52s, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.