Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-08 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G Plus is a bit better than Galaxy A70, with a score of 82.6 against 76.9. Moto G 5G Plus is a newer device than Galaxy A70, although it is somewhat heavier and thicker. Moto G 5G Plus has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a quite better pixel count in each inch in the display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2520 resolution.
The Galaxy A70 has a slightly better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds 488 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same aperture, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has a way larger camera sensor. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with a little longer battery life than Galaxy A70, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.