Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-08 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 is a bit better than the Moto G 5G Plus, having a general score of 87.5 against 82.6. Samsung Galaxy A71 is a thinner and somewhat lighter phone than the Moto G 5G Plus, although both of them were released only a couple months apart. The Samsung Galaxy A71's processing unit is just as good as Moto G 5G Plus's CPU, and although the Samsung Galaxy A71 has 2 GB more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a little sharper screen than Galaxy A71, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has a just a little better display pixel density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels. Galaxy A71 takes a bit better pictures and videos than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a back camera with a way higher resolution and a larger back camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 features just a bit more storage to install applications and games than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a SD card slot that supports 488 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A71, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.