Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-08 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has an overall score of 92.9, which is much better than the Moto G 5G Plus's global score of 82.6. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a a little thinner and a bit lighter phone than Moto G 5G Plus, although they were released with only a couple months difference. Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a screen that's very similar to the screen in Moto G 5G Plus, and although the Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a little worse pixel density, they both have a screen with the same size.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little bit better performance than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy A71 5G UW takes just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back camera with a much higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has more internal memory. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has an 11% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.