Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-08 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F41 has a score of 85.2, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus's score of 82.6. The Galaxy F41 construction has the same thickness than the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, but it is just a bit lighter. The Samsung Galaxy F41 has a bit better processing unit than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy F41 counts with a little more vivid screen than Moto G 5G Plus, although it has a just a little worse pixels density, a quite lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a quite smaller screen. Galaxy F41 takes clearer videos and photos than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low light photos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a back camera with a way better resolution and a larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality.
The Moto G 5G Plus features a bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy F41, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy F41 has improved battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because it has a 20% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.