Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-08 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, having an 88.1 score against 82.6. Even being the best phone we compare here, Galaxy F62 is an a little heavier and a bit thicker phone than the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a bit more vivid display than Moto G 5G Plus, although it has a just a bit lower pixels density and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, they both have a screen with the same size.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus and Galaxy F62 count with really similar CPUs, because although the Galaxy F62 has less cores , it also counts with more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a much longer battery duration than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy F62 has just a bit better camera than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a back camera with a lot higher resolution and a bigger back camera sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.