Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-08 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus's 82.6 score. Samsung Galaxy Fold's construction is way thinner than the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, although it's much heavier and was released around 10 months before. Moto G 5G Plus features just a bit better display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2520px, it also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a bit more powerful CPU than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light images and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also counts with a way larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos and a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
Galaxy Fold features a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.