Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-08 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Black and White |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 409 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 has an overall score of 87.7, which is a little bit better than the Moto G 5G Plus's general score of 82.6. Although it's the best we compare here, Galaxy M51's construction is just a little heavier and a little thicker than the Moto G 5G Plus. The Galaxy M51 and Motorola Moto G 5G Plus have extremely similar processors, and although the Galaxy M51 has a larger amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy M51, and although they both have a same size screen, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has a slightly better 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution and a quite higher quantity of pixels in each inch of display. The Galaxy M51 takes just a bit better videos and photos than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing photos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera and a larger sensor.
The Galaxy M51 has just a bit more memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB against 1000 GB, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy M51 has a superior battery life than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because it has a 7000mAh battery size against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.