Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2020-07-08 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 has a global score of 90.8, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus's score of 82.6. The Galaxy Note 20 construction is a little lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, although they were only released 1 months apart. Galaxy Note 20 has a bit better CPU than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a display that is very similar to the screen in Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, they both have a screen with the same size. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 16% bigger battery capacity. The Moto G 5G Plus has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto G 5G Plus also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos in low-light environments, a back-facing camera with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution and higher 30 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.