Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-08 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Moto G 5G Plus, with a general score of 98.9 against 82.6. Although the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and the Moto G 5G Plus were released only 1 months apart, Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is just a little bit heavier but also a little thinner than the Moto G 5G Plus.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little more vivid display than Moto G 5G Plus, because it has a little bigger display, a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a superior camera than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for capturing photographs and/or video in low light situations, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video resolution, a much bigger sensor and a back camera with a way better 108 MP resolution.
Moto G 5G Plus features just a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.