Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2020-07-08 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G Plus is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, with a general score of 82.6 against 81.2. Moto G 5G Plus's body is notably newer, but just a little thicker and heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Note 3. The Galaxy Note 3 features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, although it has a little bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, a little smaller display and a just a bit lower quantity of pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a processor that's just as good as Moto G 5G Plus's processing unit, because although the Galaxy Note 3 has 4 lesser 2.3 gigahertz cores and less RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processor. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus takes better photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has a lot bigger aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited situations, a way bigger sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality and a lot more MP back camera.
Moto G 5G Plus counts with a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 56% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.