Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-07-08 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note 5, with an 82.6 score against 79.3. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus's construction is notably newer than Galaxy Note 5's, but it's somewhat thicker and heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a sharper screen than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel quantity in each inch of screen and a little higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Moto G 5G Plus features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a greater number of cores. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus shoots better videos and photos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has a camera with lot more megapixels, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and a much bigger camera sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality.
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a very superior memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Moto G 5G Plus has a superior battery life than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.