Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2020-07-08 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a score of 82.6, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition's 80.4 score. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is a incredibly newer device than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but it's heavier and somewhat thicker. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition and Motorola Moto G 5G Plus have really similar CPUs, both have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features just a bit better looking display than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a quite better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Moto G 5G Plus features a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Moto G 5G Plus features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Moto G 5G Plus has a very superior camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a same size aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a bigger back camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photographs and a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.