Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2020-07-08 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a little bit better than the Moto G 5G Plus, getting an 89 score against 82.6. Samsung Galaxy Note10 is an older phone than the Moto G 5G Plus, but Samsung made it thinner and somewhat lighter. Galaxy Note10 features a screen that is very similar to the screen in Moto G 5G Plus, although the Galaxy Note10 has a quite lower 1080 x 2280px resolution, a little smaller screen and a just a little less pixels per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has just a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit better processor than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Moto G 5G Plus counts with a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh. The Moto G 5G Plus shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video, and they both have the same video definition, the Moto G 5G Plus also counts with a much bigger camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and photos and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.