Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-08 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a global score of 86.2, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus's 82.6 general score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite and Motorola Moto G 5G Plus were released only a few months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is just a little thinner and a little lighter.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a bit faster processor than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite and Moto G 5G Plus feature incredibly similar screens, and although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the display, they both have a same size display.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has 128 GB internal memory. Moto G 5G Plus counts with a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have a F1.7 aperture and the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution and a much bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.