Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-07-08 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G Plus has an overall score of 82.6, which is slightly better than Galaxy Note3's 77.7 global score. Even though Moto G 5G Plus is notably newer than the Galaxy Note3, it's just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Note3, because it has a just a little better pixel density, a bit higher 1080 x 2520 resolution and a bigger screen.
Moto G 5G Plus counts with just a little better processing power than Galaxy Note3, because it has more 2300 megahertz cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a very superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Moto G 5G Plus has a very superior camera than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a way bigger aperture for better low light captures and video, a lot larger sensor taking way higher quality pictures and videos and a back facing camera with a much better resolution.
The Moto G 5G Plus counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.